Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Compare Ciro vs. Henry - The Choice is Clear!

Ciro Rodriguez - Rated 100% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.

Henry Bonilla – Rated 33% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted NO on allowing vouchers in DC schools.

Henry Bonilla - Voted YES on allowing vouchers in DC schools.

Ciro Rodriguez - Opposes requiring school prayer.

Henry Bonilla – Supports a Constitutional Amendment for school prayer.

Ciro Rodriguez - Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record.

Henry Bonilla – Rated 11% by APHA, indicating an anti-public health voting record.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted YES on allowing reimportation of prescription drugs.

Henry Bonilla - Voted NO on allowing reimportation of prescription drugs.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted NO on forbidding expanded stem cell research.

Henry Bonilla – Voted YES on forbidding expanded stem cell research.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted NO on federal funding for health providers who refuse to inform women about reproductive health options.

Henry Bonilla - Voted YES on federal funding for health providers who refuse to inform women about reproductive health options.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad.

Henry Bonilla – Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad.

Ciro Rodriguez - Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.

Henry Bonilla - Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record.

Ciro Rodriguez - Rated 100% by the ARA, indicating a pro-senior voting record.

Henry Bonilla - Rated 0% by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted YES on strengthening the Social Security Lockbox.

Henry Bonilla - Voted NO on strengthening the Social Security Lockbox.

Ciro Rodriguez - Rated 100% by the AFL-CIO, indicating a pro-labor voting record.

Henry Bonilla - Rated 7% by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-union voting record.

Ciro Rodriguez - Rated 89% by SANE, indicating a pro-peace voting record.

Henry Bonilla - Rated 11% by SANE, indicating a pro-military voting record.

Ciro Rodriguez - Rated 79% by the ACLU, indicating a pro-civil rights voting record.

Henry Bonilla - Rated 7% by the ACLU, indicating an anti-civil rights voting record.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted YES on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol.

Henry Bonilla - Voted NO on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted YES on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR.

Henry Bonilla – Voted NO on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted NO on speeding up approval of forest thinning projects.

Henry Bonilla - Voted YES on speeding up approval of forest thinning projects (Rated 0% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes.).

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted YES on banning soft money and issue ads.

Henry Bonilla – Voted NO on banning soft money and issue ads.

Ciro Rodriguez - Voted YES on campaign finance reform banning soft-money contributions.

Henry Bonilla - Voted NO on campaign finance reform banning soft-money contributions (Voted YES on restricting independent grassroots political committees).

Has there ever been an election in a Democratic leaning district where the choice is so clear and yet the race is so close?

For more information, see Ciro on the issues and Henry on the issues.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Bonilla-a war profiteer? Documentation says "yes"


Larry Romo (photo)
Texas Demvets Chair

Researched by Larry Romo

Henry Bonilla + Alliant Techsystems Inc. Relationship

The Facts:
In early 2002, Bonilla bought through his spouse, tens of thousands of dollars in stock in defense contractor Alliant Techsystems Inc.

Later In 2002, the House Appropriations Committee designated and Congress voted authorizing $1.25 billion dollars for Alliant Techsytems, Inc. to provide Army munitions, $94 million more than the Department of Defense requested.

That same year, the Alliant Techsystems, Inc. Employees Political Action Committee (PAC) contributed $1,000 to Bonilla’s congressional campaign, in addition to the $500 he received in 2001.

With his vote in 2002 as a congressman and as a member of the Appropriations Committee, Bonilla boosted the value of his own stock in Alliant Techsystems, Inc., a company that is receiving more defense appropriations as the war in Iraq continues, meaning higher stock values and more money for campaign contributions.

This conflict of interest is highly unethical for a public official. Bonilla used his position as a congressman to boost his family personal finances and his campaign.

Documentation:
Bonilla’s 2002 Personal Financial Disclosure: http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2002/N00005985_2002.pdf

Alliant Techsystems 2002 Fall Report: http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/Krause/Alliant_TechSystems_F02.pdf#search='Alliant%20techsystems%20%20Defense%20appropriations'

Bonilla’s 2002 Campaign Contribution Report:
http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/can_give/2001_H2TX23058